All submitted papers undergo an initial editorial screening to ensure that they meet the conference’s submission requirements and are relevant to its scientific scope.
Papers that pass the initial screening are sent to two independent reviewers with expertise in the relevant field.
The conference follows a single-anonymous (single-blind) peer-review process, in which reviewers are aware of the authors’ identities, while the identities of the reviewers remain confidential.
Reviewers evaluate each paper based on its originality, scientific quality, methodological soundness, relevance, clarity of presentation, and contribution to the field. Reviewers are expected to submit their evaluation reports within seven days of receiving the manuscript.
Based on the reviewers’ reports, the Editorial Board makes the final decision regarding each submission. Possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance subject to minor revisions, a request for major revisions, or rejection.
Authors are notified of the editorial decision by email. Where revisions are required, authors receive reviewers’ comments and instructions for making the necessary changes. Revised papers may be subject to further evaluation before a final decision is made.
Acceptance for publication is conditional upon the paper meeting the journal’s academic and technical requirements.